<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for GENEralities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://generalities.bleat.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://generalities.bleat.ca</link>
	<description>THOUghts, discOverings, readings, doodLes and wOndeRings of an orDinary anglican parish priest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:57:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Mud Pies and Holidays By the Sea: Vintage CS Lewis by Glory Study &#8211; Deuteronomy 5:24 &#171; the passionate follower&#8217;s journal</title>
		<link>http://generalities.bleat.ca/2009/02/09/mud-pies-and-holidays-by-the-sea-vintage-cs-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-1933</link>
		<dc:creator>Glory Study &#8211; Deuteronomy 5:24 &#171; the passionate follower&#8217;s journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generalities.bleat.ca/?p=1105#comment-1933</guid>
		<description>[...] This account immediately reminds me of a comment made by C.S. Lewis (in &#8220;The Weight of Glory&#8220;) about how the human problem is not that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This account immediately reminds me of a comment made by C.S. Lewis (in &#8220;The Weight of Glory&#8220;) about how the human problem is not that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Provocative Statement of the Day by Ed</title>
		<link>http://generalities.bleat.ca/2010/03/05/provocative-statement-of-the-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1925</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generalities.bleat.ca/?p=1727#comment-1925</guid>
		<description>Well, Palin was, and is, a bad joke.  If Obama wants to be considered &quot;serious&quot;, he has some major work to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Palin was, and is, a bad joke.  If Obama wants to be considered &#8220;serious&#8221;, he has some major work to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vanity and Striving After Wind: Thoughts on a 63rd Birthday by David</title>
		<link>http://generalities.bleat.ca/2010/02/25/vanity-and-striving-after-wind-thoughts-on-a-63rd-birthday/comment-page-1/#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generalities.bleat.ca/?p=1725#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>Ecclesiastes is my favourite book of the Bible. I hadn&#039;t thought of it as being a Monty Python book, but now I&#039;ll have to reread it and look in earnest for funny walks etc.

Congratulations on making 63! My turn this month, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ecclesiastes is my favourite book of the Bible. I hadn&#8217;t thought of it as being a Monty Python book, but now I&#8217;ll have to reread it and look in earnest for funny walks etc.</p>
<p>Congratulations on making 63! My turn this month, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vanity and Striving After Wind: Thoughts on a 63rd Birthday by Ed</title>
		<link>http://generalities.bleat.ca/2010/02/25/vanity-and-striving-after-wind-thoughts-on-a-63rd-birthday/comment-page-1/#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generalities.bleat.ca/?p=1725#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>Blessed be the Name of the Lord indeed.  It is good be reminded that the Lord did not promise us an easy ride, only that He would be with us through it all.  Blessed be the Name of the Lord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blessed be the Name of the Lord indeed.  It is good be reminded that the Lord did not promise us an easy ride, only that He would be with us through it all.  Blessed be the Name of the Lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Provocative Statement of the Day by Ed</title>
		<link>http://generalities.bleat.ca/2010/02/22/provocative-statement-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1921</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generalities.bleat.ca/?p=1722#comment-1921</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that I feel somewhat picked on by this one.  True, the world certainly needs more love, demonstrated in all our relationships.  That said, to lay the blame for abortions entirely at the feet of men, presumably uncaring men, seems presumptuous.  I agree with you K, the world would be a better place if there were more men &quot;doing what they have been called to do and nurture their relationships and take care of things&quot;.  However, as that old adage goes, &quot;it takes two to tango&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that I feel somewhat picked on by this one.  True, the world certainly needs more love, demonstrated in all our relationships.  That said, to lay the blame for abortions entirely at the feet of men, presumably uncaring men, seems presumptuous.  I agree with you K, the world would be a better place if there were more men &#8220;doing what they have been called to do and nurture their relationships and take care of things&#8221;.  However, as that old adage goes, &#8220;it takes two to tango&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Provocative Statement of the Day by K McKee</title>
		<link>http://generalities.bleat.ca/2010/02/22/provocative-statement-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>K McKee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generalities.bleat.ca/?p=1722#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>Now that is provocative indeed. If men were good, people like David Warren would never have to make a provocative statement such as this. Sad commentary that there are more passive or aggressive Adams out there in the world than those who are doing what they have been called to do and nurture their relationships and take care of things. Good one. Enjoyed that wee tidbit today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that is provocative indeed. If men were good, people like David Warren would never have to make a provocative statement such as this. Sad commentary that there are more passive or aggressive Adams out there in the world than those who are doing what they have been called to do and nurture their relationships and take care of things. Good one. Enjoyed that wee tidbit today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CofE Resolution in Support of the Anglican Church of North America (ACNA) by Gene</title>
		<link>http://generalities.bleat.ca/2010/02/11/cofe-resolution-in-support-of-the-anglican-church-of-north-america-acna/comment-page-1/#comment-1905</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generalities.bleat.ca/?p=1701#comment-1905</guid>
		<description>The Church of England.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Church of England.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CofE Resolution in Support of the Anglican Church of North America (ACNA) by Ed</title>
		<link>http://generalities.bleat.ca/2010/02/11/cofe-resolution-in-support-of-the-anglican-church-of-north-america-acna/comment-page-1/#comment-1904</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generalities.bleat.ca/?p=1701#comment-1904</guid>
		<description>Hi Gene, whose Synod is this resolution from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gene, whose Synod is this resolution from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For Glen Bell with Reference to Isa 25.6-9 and John 14.1-6 by Dim Lamp</title>
		<link>http://generalities.bleat.ca/2010/02/08/for-glen-bell-with-reference-to-isa-25-6-9-and-john-14-1-6/comment-page-1/#comment-1902</link>
		<dc:creator>Dim Lamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generalities.bleat.ca/?p=1694#comment-1902</guid>
		<description>Well done. I like the way you weave the Transfiguration theme into the message and how you highlight the promises of Scripture, which comfort those who mourn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done. I like the way you weave the Transfiguration theme into the message and how you highlight the promises of Scripture, which comfort those who mourn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sabbath Interesting Bits: Anglicanism, Marriage, Leadership and the Covenant by Ed</title>
		<link>http://generalities.bleat.ca/2010/02/03/sabbath-interesting-bits-anglicanism-marriage-leadership-and-the-covenant/comment-page-1/#comment-1881</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generalities.bleat.ca/?p=1679#comment-1881</guid>
		<description>Is homosexuality compatible with Scripture?  No, it is not.  Therefore, a) it does matter if there is &quot;an open contradiction&quot; in this regard, and b) we can not live with it.  I think this is one of those &quot;sitting on the fence&quot; issues, and we can not live there.  Satan owns the fence, and as long as we sit on it we become less effective in presenting the Gospel as a clear road map for living life.  We have to decide which side of fence we are going to jump to.  For me, if that is accept that homosexuality as being Scriptural, then I must go elsewhere.  If that means taking a stand that homosexuality is unScriptural, which then means we must find some other way to maintain our Anglican roots, count me in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is homosexuality compatible with Scripture?  No, it is not.  Therefore, a) it does matter if there is &#8220;an open contradiction&#8221; in this regard, and b) we can not live with it.  I think this is one of those &#8220;sitting on the fence&#8221; issues, and we can not live there.  Satan owns the fence, and as long as we sit on it we become less effective in presenting the Gospel as a clear road map for living life.  We have to decide which side of fence we are going to jump to.  For me, if that is accept that homosexuality as being Scriptural, then I must go elsewhere.  If that means taking a stand that homosexuality is unScriptural, which then means we must find some other way to maintain our Anglican roots, count me in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
